This content has been archived. It may no longer be relevant
I want to take a moment this week and discuss matters from a slightly different angle. Nothing here marks a particularly new principle, as the crux of it has been put forward on this site before, but it’s never been the primary focus. Today I want to make it the focus.
I’d like to begin with a statement that’s likely to make you chuckle, but don’t be fooled – it’ no joke:
You’re only paranoid if you’re wrong.
Think about it for a moment… if you believe that someone is out to get you somehow, and they actually are – that’s not paranoia, that’s accurate.
Some time back, during a rather brief discussion about events transpiring following the “election”, a good friend of mine stated; “do you realize how many people would have to be in on this for this to be some grand conspiracy?!”
“Not as many as you think” I replied, citing that the use of electronic tabulation puts the final power of the count in the hands of an elite few; the software designers and programmers. It being clear we weren’t going to agree, I told him to please demonstrate for me how Joe Biden was the most popular Presidential candidate in U.S. history… and then we dropped the matter.
None of that is to call out or verbally attack my friend – he’s not alone in his assessment, but then neither am I. The issue stems form the inability of one side of the debate to actually consider the allegations of the other. The media, complicit in these matters as they so obviously are, are of no help to anyone… and that, ladies and gentlemen, brings me to my point: they – the media and those who accept the results of this fraudulent election – relegate dissenting opinions and voices to the realm of conspiracy theory… and factually speaking, this is an appropriate definition. What’s inappropriate is what people think this means.
Conspiracy
1 the act of conspiring.
2 an evil, unlawful, treacherous, or surreptitious plan formulated in secret by two or more persons; plot.
3 a combination of persons for a secret, unlawful, or evil purpose:He joined the conspiracy to overthrow the government.
4 Law. an agreement by two or more persons to commit a crime, fraud, or other wrongful act.
5 any concurrence in action; combination in bringing about a given result.
Does anyone see the words, crazy, insane, foolish or stupid presented there? I ask, because I most certainly do not.
Furthermore;
Theory
1 a coherent group of tested general propositions, commonly regarded as correct, that can be used as principles of explanation and prediction for a class of phenomena:Einstein’s theory of relativity.
2 a proposed explanation whose status is still conjectural and subject to experimentation, in contrast to well-established propositions that are regarded as reporting matters of actual fact.
3 Mathematics. a body of principles, theorems, or the like, belonging to one subject:number theory.
4 the branch of a science or art that deals with its principles or methods, as distinguished from its practice:music theory.
5 a particular conception or view of something to be done or of the method of doing it; a system of rules or principles:conflicting theories of how children best learn to read.
6 contemplation or speculation:the theory that there is life on other planets.
Still no terminology I see that could, or should be used to casually dismiss a well-thought, observant and cognitive viewpoint… maybe our culture will wake up soon and remember that words mean things and that what they mean isn’t whatever we feel like they should mean at the time.
Now, I’d like for you to perform a thought experiment with me.
Select a “terrorist organization”. Any one will do – there’s certainly no shortage of them today.
Now select a banking organization that might be used by said organization to launder money in order to fund their nefarious activities.
Got ’em? Good.
Now; ask yourself the following questions:
1 – Do the agents of the terrorist organization constitute conspirators?
2 – Do the agents of the banking organization constitute conspirators?
The answer to the first question is an obvious and emphatic YES. The answer to the second question becomes decidedly more complex…
If members of the banking organization are aware who they are dealing with and choose to do business with them anyway, then yes – they do qualify as conspirators because they are complicit:
Complicit
choosing to be involved in an illegal or questionable act, especially with others; having complicity.
Now ask yourself this; the low-level banking clerks and agents, simply doing their jobs with no inside knowledge of who the actors are – the people simply enabling the transfer of funds from one account to another… are they conspirators? Are they complicit?
The answer there would be no. They are useful to those who are conspirators and who are complicit, but they themselves, barring knowledge of what is truly happening right under their proverbial noses, are neither complicit nor conspirators.
So lets take this a step further…
In order for this terrorist organization to orchestrate an event that requires a massive amount of coordination and funding, precisely how many conspirators will be required in order to pull this off?
Depending on the nature and scope of the event, the answer is; not that many.
Moving on from our thought experiment, let’s engage in another – but on a whole different scale.
Let’s say that we are looking at the formulation of a conspiracy on a much larger scale – a scale that will require the participation of large number of knowledgeable, complicit conspirators in order to carry out the plan.
Human nature being what it is – and knowing that a person’s conscience can cause confessions and actions that are otherwise undesirable to the desired outcome of the conspirators… what then is the most plausible means through which to ensure silence and participation?
Dirt.
Dirt is the answer we’re looking for here.
If someone has “dirt” on you, something that condemns you and holds you to the same potential fate as they, logic dictates that your own sense of self-preservation is going to drive you to take actions that help to conceal the nature of that dirt and keep it from public scrutiny.
The fact is that within the highest reaches of our governments, entertainment industries, financial institutions and sadly, even our theological organizations, dirt is – and has been – the preferred currency of choice for longer than you or I would be comfortable admitting.
I’d wager that, on some level, you know this to be true intuitively. The question becomes, why?
You know why.
The sad truth is that more nefarious activities are taking place around us at any moment than we’d even want to know – and therein lies the problem. How else do “first world” nations like the U.S. and the U.K become the most prolific centers of human trafficking? Why is this and what is going on here?
We’re cited facts like this and given statistics on such matters, but how many traffickers do you know? How many have you seen? How many live in your neighborhood?
You understand of course, that human trafficking – or better called by its true name: slavery – is by default a conspiracy; particularly in nations wherein such activities are illegal.
Last question…
Why is it so much easier for many to believe in a vast criminal conspiracy that would mark the United States as the world’s largest purveyor of human slaves, than to believe that our government is dirty and that election results can be completely fabricated?
Seriously… if you know, please explain it to me because that strikes me as outright stupidity at worst – and cognitive dissonance at best.
I have a conspiracy theory for you… it is not one that just occurred to me in a moment, but is he culmination of years of careful and thoughtful observation:
Satanism is rampant throughout our world. Not a nation ~ the world. It is prevalent within the highest reaches of our governments, entertainment industries, financial institutions and our theological organizations. It’s preferred currency is dirt and this currency has been the bedrock of conspiracies that have toppled nations, installed dictators, fomented conflicts and even wars that were useful to the aims of those active conspirators who helped to bring them about.
Ladies and gentlemen, the idea that an election could be stolen isn’t ridiculous – the idea that such could not transpire in a nation with some of the most sophisticated criminal networks engaged in the trade of human slaves – a nation that believes itself enlightened – is.
All of that to say this;
A wicked decree has gone out against this nation and, by extension, to the world. This must be overturned, else we are lost. This is being evidenced daily by an “administration” that seeks not only to turn America to a path of wickedness, but the world as well.
The only court that is going to give us any real justice, regardless of where you live, is the Court of Heaven and so we must ply our requests to that court. We must plead our case before the King of the Universe until such time as His justice is administered here on Earth as it is in Heaven.
Then Jesus told them a parable to show them they should always pray and not lose heart.
.
He said, “In a certain city there was a judge who neither feared God nor respected people. There was also a widow in that city who kept coming to him and saying, ‘Give me justice against my adversary.’ For a while he refused, but later on he said to himself, ‘Though I neither fear God nor have regard for people, yet because this widow keeps on bothering me, I will give her justice, or in the end she will wear me out by her unending pleas.’”
.
And the Lord said, “Listen to what the unrighteous judge says! Won’t God give justice to his chosen ones, who cry out to him day and night? Will he delay long to help them? I tell you, he will give them justice speedily. Nevertheless, when the Son of Man comes, will he find faith on earth?”
Luke 18:1 – 8
Until next time,
שלום עליכם – Shalom Aleichem – Peace Be Upon You